Apologetics Index: Information about religious cults, religious sects, anticult organizations, Christian apologetics and counter-cult ministries.  Also: daily religion news




» » » News Articles Database   
» »

About this page

A process that reverses alleged brainwashing. Controversial in that the process is usually started without the voluntary cooperation of the person being deprogrammed. (Initially, the term referred to both voluntary and involuntary intervention. Over time, however, the term came to refer primarily to involuntary intervention).

The vast majority of anti-cult and counter-cult professionals never engaged in involuntary deprogramming, but instead prefer voluntary exit-Counseling. This fact is largely ignored by cult apologists who - devoid of any real arguments - prefer to dessiminate misinformation about the counter-cult movement, mind-control, apostates, etc.

A small percentage of cult members leave their group or relationship by means of an exit counseling, an intervention similar to that done with someone who has a drug or alcohol abuse problem. These are planned meetings of the members, the family or friends, and a team of professionals who use an educational model to enable the member to reach an informed decision about here or his allegiance to the group.

In the 1970s increasing numbers of families became concerned with the role of cults in their children's new and disturbing behavior: dropping out of school, cutting ties to families and friends, and sometimes disappearing completely. In this context, efforst at ''deprogramming'' emerged, which were early attempts to deal with what appeared to be a type of brainwashing used by the groups on their members. The term deprogramming  was used to identify a process originally seen as the polar opposite of the cults' ''programming'' of members.

Over time, as cults increasingly prevented outsiders, including families, from having access to members, deprogramming began to involve the actual abduction and forcible detention of the cult member in a locked room at home or in a motel or in whatever localed the deprogramming was taking place. Although initially not a coercive process, deprogramming is currently associated with ''snatching'' and confinement of cult members by their families.

Although frequently successful in getting an individuals out of the cult or cultic relationship, this type of involuntary  intervation can produce problems. Kidnapping and detention have been found to be traumatizing in their own right. Ex-members who have been deprogrammed report being highly ambivilent about the experience. Though grateful to their parents or spouse for getting them out of a cult, they sometimes also feel deep anger over the manner of the intervention. Posttraumatic symptoms such as nightmares, intrusive thoughts, and flashbacks of the deprogramming may also slow down their recovery from the cult experience.

We acknowledge the deep pain of families who feel there are no other alternatives to freeing their loved one from an abusive, restrictive cult or relationship, but we are opposed to deprogramming as a means of getting someone out of a cult. It may seem to be the only course of action, but there is danger of the family being misinformed and panicking. Many times, with patience, a way can be discovered and developed that will lead to a less traumatic exiting from the group.

As legal risks have increased and parents and most deprogrammers have become concerned over the ethical issues, new noncoercive means of helping cultists have develoepd. Deprogramming has been replaced by a more respectful approach, which is educational in nature, more professional in delivery, more effective in outcome and, because it is voluntary, generally nontraumatizing. This process, known as exit counseling, is described in Carol Giambalvo's book, Exit Counseling : A Family Intervention, important reading for anyone interested in learning more about this type of voluntary intervention. Professionals who help cult members make informed decisions about their group affiliations are known as ''exit counselors,'' or ''cult information specialists.''

''Exit counselors are usually former cult members themselves,'' writes Carol Giambalvo. ''They have firsthand experience with mind control. They have knowledge of cult mind-sets, they dynamics of cult membership, and the history of the particular cult in question and its leader(s). They also have the ability to bypass closed thinking brought about by mind control in order to reaccess the cultis's critical thinking abilities. These are vital areas of expertise.''

One advantage of an exit counseling is that participants receive a short course on cults and thought reforms along with the opportunity to learn howe their particular group or leader deviates from accepted moral practices or belief structures. They learn the origin of the group's belief system, which may have been misinterpreted or kept hidden from them. This educational process provides them with an understanding of the true nature of their cult involvement. Armed with information and resources, and often backed up by an educated and supportive family environment, former cult members are more prepared to face the recovery process.



- News Articles Database -
» Database of archived news items
(Includes items added between Oct. 25, 1999 and Jan. 31, 2002. See about this database)

See Also

» Apologetics Index Statement regarding brainwashing, deprogramming
   and exit counseling.
» Ex-cult counseling resources
» Exit-Counseling
» Thought Reform Consultation


Secular The Anti-Cult Movement Extensive site that criticizes the anti-cult movement for its erstwhile practice of deprogramming. Documents the history of the practice and its abuses, and examines the underlying theory of mind control. Web master, Bernie, is a former Scientologist who left the Church of Scientology on his own accord. On the Scientology portion of his site, he also takes anti-cultists to task:
"...my position in the Scientology issue is a rather special one: on the one hand, I am a Scientology ex-member and a Scientology critic; on the other hand, I am critical of the abuses of the counter movement."

Unfortunately, the site provides a rather one-sided view, and the site's author tends to come across as a cult apologist rather than a serious researcher.

About this page:
First posted: Dec. 13, 1996
Last Updated: Sep. 24, 2003
Copyright: Apologetics Index
Link to: http://www.apologeticsindex.org/d22.html
» Copyright and Linking Policy
» How to use this site