Ron Enroth's Response To Jon Trott An Apologetics Index research resource |
|
|
Ron Enroth's Response To Jon TrottNote: Hyperlinks added by Apologetics Index
Apr. 1, 2001: See related news item
Page 1/7
Next Page
For reasons known only to him, Mr. Jon Trott of Jesus People USA (JPUSA) Covenant Church has decided to re-open the controversy surrounding my writing about former members of that congregation in the book, Recovering From Churches That Abuse (Zondervan, 1994). I had hoped and thought that the members of JPUSA had ''buried the hatchet'' and put the issue (dating back six or seven years) behind them. Instead, Mr. Trott has revisited the controversy by writing a chapter in a recently published book published by New York University Press. The chapter is entitled, ''Is Abuse About Truth or Story: Or Both?'' and is part of an edited volume, Bad Pastors: Clergy Misconduct in Modern America
Not only letters, but copies of letters, began circulating. This ''communication by fax'' became a multivoiced but ultimately futile dialogue involving JPUSA, the ECC, Enroth, and various interested others (including other evangelical countercultists). There is no way to represent the sheer volume of the correspondence . . . (p. 163)
[Trott specifically identifies ''interested observers'' including Willian Backus, Ruth Tucker, Eliot Miller, Francis Beckwith, Norman Geisler, Bob and Gretchen Passantino, and Anson Shupe, and then adds] . . . all of whom I sent much of the Enroth vs. JPUSA correspondence. (p. 163)
But Zondervan's Stan Gundry was shocked to discover that I had been sending Nearly all the correspondence between Enroth, Zondervan, the ECC, and JPUSA to various Christian spokespersons. Gundry seemed most shocked when I mentioned having sent the entire correspondence (more than an inch thick even at that point) to professional acquaintances at Christianity Today . . . .
(p. 165)
. . . Anson Shupe . . . agreed to visit us after reading the correspondence I'd sent him . . . (p. 165)
. . . Norm Geisler . . . wrote Enroth regarding the correspondence I'd forwarded ... (p. 166)
. . . dozens of packets of the entire correspondence (some forty letters, most more than one page) had been mailed to various evangelical and secular spokespersons. (p. 168)
Attorneys familiar with intellectual property law have clearly indicated that personal correspondence is covered by copyright, according to Section 102(a)
Next Page
Looking for more information?
Loading
|