Missionary Threat (Rick Ross): David Clark Responds To Rick Ross and “The Missionary Threat” Booklet
 |
Table of Contents
- Missionary Threat (Rick Ross): Evaluating The Missionary Threat - Introduction
- Missionary Threat (Rick Ross): David Clark Responds To Rick Ross and "The Missionary Threat" Booklet
Previous: Missionary Threat (Rick Ross): Evaluating The Missionary Threat – Introduction
Part:
I am the Christian professional who Mr. Ross refers to in the Ellen Kamentsky case. As stated above, I made it very clear to him that the case was a voluntary exit counseling — not a deprogramming. Such usage of terms causes confusion and becomes problematic. Rick claims that radical religious leaders and their apologists have denounced deprogramming for one simple reason: it works. Even though this is one of the primary reasons, it is too simplistic and inaccurate to reduce it to only one reason. Black and white thinking is the very thing mind control cults have been cited for.The remainder of this section focuses on Jewish concerns and interests which he and they have the right to address, being responsible for whatever way they choose to handle them. Although I have great sympathy for families who struggle with grave concerns about destructive mind control groups, I do not think we should mix and match true religious differences under the heading of radical religious groups without full and proper distinctions being clearly defined. Religious proselytizing is not exclusive to Christian missionaries but is as old as mankind. Destructive cult mind control is specific to deceptive, unethical, high demand, and high control organizations. Honest zealotry in ethical missionary activity is not the same thing, and should not be misleadingly labeled as such. The Missionary Threat booklet weaves in and out of these kinds of terms and requires careful deliberation just to identify implications that seem very intentional. Mr. Ross mentions several books that are available in understanding the missionary threat and its psychology and methodology, including Hawking God by Ellen Kamensky. I do not dispute the harmful and abusive experiences Ellen claimed to have had and I believed it was my God-given obligation to assist a truly needy family who sought my professional assistance. I would do it again if there is true justification for it. As a conscientious Christian professional I have grave concerns that Christian missionary activity is now being labeled a threat in the same sense as destructive cult activity, which it is not, and it should not be identified as such. It’s very clear that Rick Ross claims otherwise.
Missionary Threat (Rick Ross): Evaluating The Missionary Threat – Introduction
Bookmark, Share, or Email This Page
More About...
Comment
• Note: If the current entry includes a Table of Contents (top, right-hand corner), the comments section is located on the first page of the entry (and may indeed be open. Do check.) Also, on some entries, the comments section is located on a separate page. Again, see the topic's Table of Contents -- if included.
Subscribe to Apologetics Index updates via RSS news feed or email
• Subscribe to this feed (RSS) • Subscribe by email
About This Page
• This page, Missionary Threat (Rick Ross): David Clark Responds To Rick Ross and “The Missionary Threat” Booklet, was first posted: Dec. 29, 2005• The entry was last updated: Jan. 4, 2006
About Apologetics Index
• How to use this site • Copyright and Linking Policy • About this website • Disclaimer
More Apologetics & Countercult Research?
• Select a topic from our A-Z Index• See our home page for the latest updates and additions to the site
• Or use our Google-powered search engine:
