Missionary Threat (Rick Ross): David Clark Responds To Rick Ross and “The Missionary Threat” Booklet
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z # Home |
Table of Contents
- Missionary Threat (Rick Ross): Evaluating The Missionary Threat - Introduction
- Missionary Threat (Rick Ross): David Clark Responds To Rick Ross and "The Missionary Threat" Booklet
Previous: Missionary Threat (Rick Ross): Evaluating The Missionary Threat - Introduction
Part:
Mr. Ross states that “Not all evangelical Christian groups are destructive, but many have deep and serious problems that have drawn concern even of members of their own community.” After making major slams against Christian missionary activity we are informed that not all Christian groups are destructive. Which is it? Orthodox Christianity by its very nature is missionary oriented as nearly 2000 years of Christian history clearly attest, although Mr.Ross points out correctly that members of the Christian Community have concerns about destructive groups who call themselves Christian. What orthodox Christian organization supports anti-Christian missionary activity? That’s like a Jewish organization declaring Moses was not a Jew. This boils down to contradicting the very nature of what you are by religious orientation. This kind of double talk is convoluted and confusing. In this same section we are informed that those who are born Jewish and become Christians are now pseudo- Jews posing as experts about Judaism and its traditions implying that this is some kind of impossibility, how ludicrous. Does my becoming a Christian mean I am no longer of English descent? Have I become a pseudo-Englishman? How absurd! What kind of intellectual and genetic dishonesty is being promoted here? One could understand why the Jewish community would want to maintain the identity of its community and religious expressions but redefining Semitic blood lines into false categories is not rational.Under the heading “Deprogramming the Victims” Rick identifies radical religious groups as the deprogramming issue. It is interesting to note that after he attempts a major broadside at Christian evangelism we encounter this bait and switch sleight of hand by singling out radical religious groups. That raises an important point. Are all radical religious groups subjects for deprogramming? What is the essential difference between mind control and truly extreme religious convictions? I never knew that Robert J.Lifton in chapter 22 of his book Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism defined all radical religious groups as brainwashing organizations. The cult apologists will have a heyday with that one.
Missionary Threat (Rick Ross): Evaluating The Missionary Threat - Introduction
Share this
To share this page simply copy and paste one of the below URL's:
Comment
• Note: If the current entry includes a Table of Contents, the comments section is located on the first page of the entry (and may indeed be open. Do check.) Also, on some entries, the comments section is located on a separate page. See that topic's Table of Contents.
Subscribe to Apologetics Index updates via RSS news feed or email• Subscribe to this feed (RSS)
• Subscribe by email
Link to this page
• Permalink to Missionary Threat (Rick Ross): David Clark Responds To Rick Ross and “The Missionary Threat” Booklet
Information:
• This page was first posted: Dec. 29, 2005
• This page was last updated: Jan. 4, 2006
• How to use this site • Copyright and Linking Policy • Disclaimer
About Apologetics Index
The Apologetics Index (apologeticsindex.org) 'family of web sites' provides 25,000+ pages of research resources on religious cults, sects, new religious movements, alternative religions, apologetics-, anticult-, and countercult organizations, doctrines, religious practices and world views. These resources reflect a variety of theological and/or sociological perspectives. [More Info]
