Why many Muslims reject CAIR

Apologetics Index breadcrumbs You are here: Apologetics Index | CAIR | Why many Muslims reject CAIR

CAIR, the Council on American Islamic Relations, is a controversial Islamic lobbying group based in Washington, DC.

It claims to denounce terrorism, but in fact supports Islamic extremism, including the suicide bombings carried out by Hamas.

[R]eporters are learning it's not easy to find leaders who can authentically speak for Muslim Americans, who represent a wide variety of ethnicities and languages, sects and political views ranging from completely secular to Islamic fundamentalist. CAIR and AMC in particular would not be chosen as representatives by many Muslims. In fact, there are those in American Muslim communities as well as law enforcement who consider CAIR and the AMC to be part of the problem, because both have been seen as tacitly -- if not explicitly -- supportive of extremist groups guilty of terrorism.
- Source: Islam's flawed spokesmen, Salon.com, Sep. 26, 2001

That was written in September, 2001, just two weeks after 9/11.

To-date, not much has changed:

For years, CAIR has attempted to stifle debate and prevent inquiry into the domestic spread of radical Islam. Conservative columnist Cal Thomas was the latest target, when CAIR attempted to drum him out of his role as an official commentator at WTOP radio in Washington, D.C. The group was emboldened by its success in the same city two years earlier, when it got then-Disney-owned WMAL to can talk host Michael Graham. Similar such smear campaigns are legion.
If only CAIR could muster the same contempt—or any contempt, for that matter—for Islamic terrorists.
Contrary to the letter’s claim that the group “has consistently taken a principled position against terrorism and extremism,” CAIR simply has not done so. Never has CAIR condemned by name Islamic terrorist organizations Hamas and Hezbollah. Given the opportunity to condemn Hamas by Newsweek last December, CAIR executive director and co-founder Nihad Awad refused, claiming that the question was “the game of the pro-Israel lobby.”
While CAIR incessantly hypes its 2005 fatwa against terrorism and extremism, the document intentionally avoided defining the two terms. Fundamentalist Muslims who wish harm upon the U.S. and Israel do not consider themselves “extreme.” Nor do Hezbollah and Hamas believe that they are terrorists.
This is CAIR’s modus operandi: appearing to oppose terrorism, while simultaneously leading the charge against those who actually seek to thwart it.
Its approach to the lecture circuit is no different.
- Source: Joel Mowbray, CAIR They Go Again!, Townhall, Aug. 3, 2007

Learn more about CAIR here, and keep track of CAIR's antics at Religion News Blog.

Bookmark, Share, Print or Email This Page

More About...

Topic: CAIR

Comment

Responses are currently closed, but you can comment on your own website, blog, or elsewhere (e.g. Google+, Facebook) and include a 'trackback' link to this page.
Note: If the current entry includes a Table of Contents (top, right-hand corner), the comments section is located on the first page of the entry (and may indeed be open. Do check.) Also, on some entries, the comments section is located on a separate page. Again, see the topic's Table of Contents -- if included.