![]() |
Clarification concerning the article THE NEW ROMANTICS in the Spring 2001 issue of Intelligence Report. |
|
|
Clarification concerning the article THE NEW ROMANTICS in the Spring 2001 issue of Intelligence Report.by Mattias Gardell
The following was sent to Apologia
---------------- Begin Forwarded Message ---------------- Date: 4/10/01 4:56 PM Received: 4/11/01 11:16 AM From: Clifton Chas, clifton@uscolo.edu To: -R Poll, richpoll@apologia.org Rich, First of all, did you see Gardell's "clarification"? I wanted to make sure that you had. I will pass your request for the other position to some Asatruar. Chas >X-Sender: Mattias@mail.ceifo.su.se >Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 12:16:18 +0200 >To: clifton@uscolo.edu >From: Mattias Gardell <mattias.gardell@ceifo.su.se> >Subject: Clarification of SPLC interview > >Dear Professor Clifton, > >Jeff Kaplan suggested that I should contact you in the hopes of clarifying >a set of misunderstandings that has caused a minor thunderstorm of protests >from upset pagans of many traditions. It concerns an interview published in >the Spring 2001 issue of SPLC's Intelligence Report that unfortunately has >been interpreted as if it dealt with the worldwide pagan community, which >it in fact did not. Jeff, whom I know since several years, told me that you >sponsor the NUREL list and that it might be a good idea to ask you if you >kindly would post the following message (with permission to crosspost).=20 > >Best, > >Mattias > > >Clarification concerning the article THE NEW ROMANTICS in the Spring 2001 >issue of Intelligence Report. > >1. I was NOT talking about the whole neo-pagan community in the United >States. The interview focused on the racist interpretation of Asatr=FA often >referred to as Odinism. I also tried to make clear the distinction between >the racist and ethnic positions as these two very different interpretations >of Norse traditions often are confused. (The wider non-racial non-folkish >pan-pagan milieu was hardly mentioned at all. There is a growing body of >studies concerning the wider pagan revival but that was not the topic of >the interview and will neither be the focus of my forthcoming study. >However, I do will make the distinctions clear)=20 > >2. The line 'everybody supports the Unambomber' is somewhat taken out of >context. It should have been made much clearer that I here talked about the >radical environmentalist subsection of racist Odinism where one does find >considerable support for the Unabomber. The word 'everybody' was a casual >metaphor that I would never use in writing. It came in the course of a 4 >hours something transatlantic interview over the phone and I am sorry for >having made that slip. > >A note to introduce myself: > >I am an Associate Professor of the History of Religions at Stockholm >University. I did my PhD on Black religious nationalism with a focus on >the Nation of Islam. It was based on field research and taped interviews >with Minister Farrakhan and his top lieutenants and from the feedback I've >got from the Black Muslims I can assure you that they feel accurately >portraid. In case you're interested you can make up your own mind by >reading IN THE NAME OF ELIJAH MUHAMMAD: LOUIS FARRAKHAN AND THE NATION OF >ISLAM (Duke University Press, 1996). > >Since 1996 I have been doing a series of fieldworks in the radical >right/White religious nationalist milieus, publishing (in Swedish) a >comparative study of black and white separatism named RASRISK (Federativs >f=F6rlag, 1998). During the course of that study, I was fascinated with the >Odinist/racist heathen tendencies within the Aryan revolutionary milieu and >decided to make that the topic of my next study. As with my former studies, >it is based on field research and taped interviews and aims at portraying >the multifaceted scene as accurately as possible. Contrary to lumping all >pagans and fascists together, it discusses at length the variations of >viewpoints that exist both within and between the many different pagan (and >fascist) milieus. Hopefully, it will come out as a nuanced, >thought-provocing and stimulating reading. > >May the Gods and Goddesses enlighten your path > >Mattias Gardell ----------------- End Forwarded Message ----------------- Also see "The New Romantics," published by the Southern Poverty Law Center in Intelligence Report, Spr '01. <http://www.splcenter.org/intelligenceproject/ip-index.html <http://www.splcenter.org/intelligenceproject/ip-4q9.html> (Direct link to the article). In the Name of Elijah Muhammad: Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam By Mattias Gardell.
About this page: |
More Information:Apologetics Index (apologeticsindex.org) provides 40,870+
pages of research resources on religious cults, sects, new religious movements, alternative religions, apologetics-, anticult-, and countercult organizations, doctrines, religious practices and world views. These resources reflect a variety of theological and/or sociological perspectives.
The site provides information that helps equip Christians to logically present and defend the Christian faith, and that aids non-Christians in their comparison of various religious claims. Issues addressed range from spiritual and cultic abuse to contemporary theological and/or sociological concerns. Apologetics Index also includes ex-cult support resources - including a directory of cult experts (CultExperts.org), up-to-date religion and cult news (Religon News Blog: ReligionNewsBlog.com), articles on Christian life and ministry, and a variety of other features. |
|
Look, "feel" and original content are © Copyright 1996-2010+, Apologetics Index Pages on this site may not be copied or framed. Copyright and Linking Policy |